ADM Jabalpur v Shivkant Shukla Case Analysis( Suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency; The Habeas Corpus Case)

ADM Jabalpur v Shivkant Shukla Case Analysis( Suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency; The Habeas Corpus Case)

Citation: AIR 1976 SC 1207  Bench: A.N. Ray, M. Hameedullah Beg, Y.V. Chandrachud, Hans Raj Khanna, P.N. Bhagwati  The 1975 Emergency is considered by many…

View More ADM Jabalpur v Shivkant Shukla Case Analysis( Suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency; The Habeas Corpus Case)
State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan : Lawcirca: Arushi Anand

State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights and DPSP)

CITATION: AIR 1951 SC 226 BENCH   Hiralal J. Kania, C.J.; Saiyid Fazal Ali, J.; M. Patanjali Sastri, J.; Mehr Chand Mahajan, J.; Vivian Bose,…

View More State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights and DPSP)
Public Interest Litigation- Genesis and Evolution

Public Interest Litigation- Genesis and Evolution

The concept of public interest law was widely adopted in the USA and was used extensively during and after the social turmoil of the 1960s. The concept of public interest law was demonstrated and applied by Louis Brandeis, who in his legal practice actively advocated for the interests of the general public.

View More Public Interest Litigation- Genesis and Evolution

What is the difference between Article 32 and Article 226 of the Indian constitution?

Understanding Article 32 under the Indian Constitution Article 32 is the right to constitutional remedies enshrined under Part III of the constitution. Right to constitutional…

View More What is the difference between Article 32 and Article 226 of the Indian constitution?