State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan : Lawcirca: Arushi Anand

State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights and DPSP)

CITATION: AIR 1951 SC 226 BENCH   Hiralal J. Kania, C.J.; Saiyid Fazal Ali, J.; M. Patanjali Sastri, J.; Mehr Chand Mahajan, J.; Vivian Bose,…

View More State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights and DPSP)
Minerva Mills v union of india: Lawcirca: Arushi Anand

Minerva Mills v. Union of India (Basic Structure, Parliament’s Power to amendment and Power of Judicial Review)

CITATION: 1980 AIR 1789 BENCH: Y. V. Chandrachud (C.J.I.), N. L. Untwalia (J.), P. N. Bhagwati (J.), A. C. Gupta (J.), and P. S. Kailasam…

View More Minerva Mills v. Union of India (Basic Structure, Parliament’s Power to amendment and Power of Judicial Review)
doctrine of colourable legislation: Shrishti Natani Lawcirca

Everything you need to know about the Doctrine of Colourable Legislation

INTRODUCTION The doctrine of Colorable Legislation means where the constitution of a State distributes the constitutional realms defined by specific legislative entries, or where there…

View More Everything you need to know about the Doctrine of Colourable Legislation
Public Interest Litigation- Genesis and Evolution

Public Interest Litigation- Genesis and Evolution

The concept of public interest law was widely adopted in the USA and was used extensively during and after the social turmoil of the 1960s. The concept of public interest law was demonstrated and applied by Louis Brandeis, who in his legal practice actively advocated for the interests of the general public.

View More Public Interest Litigation- Genesis and Evolution